Fatcow Icon
Pickens considers smoking ban
by Sandy Foster
Feb 04, 2009 | 2492 views | 3 3 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
PICKENS – It may soon be illegal to smoke in public places in the city of Pickens.

Members of city council are considering an ordinance that would prohibit the “possession of lighted smoking materials in any form, including but not limited to the possession of lighted cigarettes, cigars, pipes or other tobacco products.”

They unanimously passed first reading of the ordinance and plan to take a closer look at it during a work session in two weeks before taking a second and final vote.

Two members of the public, Jerry Black and Tony Kobach, spoke out against the ordinance.

“It should be up to the individual business owner whether or not they want smoking or non-smoking,” Black said.

Kobach, who owns Tony’s Restaurant, suggested that council have a referendum vote to see what the public wants

Prior to the vote, Council member Jason Cassell said his restaurant, Pizza Inn went non-smoking eight to 10 years ago and that it had not affected his business.

“It’s somewhat the norm now,” he said. “I think we’re looking out for everybody these days.”

The ordinance defines public place as any enclosed area to which the public is invited or in which the public is allowed to meet, conduct business or recreate.

This includes restaurants, retail stores and establishments that sell or distribute beer, wine or alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption, the ordinance states.

However, private residences; hotel, motel and bed and breakfast rooms rented to guests and designated as smoking rooms; religious ceremonies where smoking is part of the ritual; and private clubs or lodges would not fall under the ban.

Also, establishments that make 50 percent or more of their revenue from blending tobacco, or selling tobacco, pipes, cigars and smokers’ sundries are also exempt.

Citizens within the city limits would also not be allowed to use tobacco products in enclosed city-owned buildings and vehicles, or at events in town, like parades and festivals.

Council agreed Monday to change to fine for violating the ordinance to $25, to fall in line with the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Indoor Air Act.

The cities of Liberty, Easley and Clemson already have smoking bans.

Mayor David Owens said second reading would take place the second Monday of the month, and he invited the public to speak about the ordinance at that time.

He also said anyone with information or comments prior to that meeting should speak with their council representative.

“We certainly want to make it fair for everyone,” he said.

If approved, Owens said the ordinance would go into effect May 1.

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
lonewolfnpickens
|
February 09, 2009
I was just wondering why everyone is spending tax money on something like a prohibiting smoking in Pickens County when every day people are losing their jobs,health care,and not knowing where their next meal is coming from and all some of these people think about is stopping smoking.I think that the people in Pickens County need to take a long hard look what is really important LIKE BRINGING JOBS TO PICKENS AND HELPING THOSE IN NEED.Why does just a few people have the right to tell all the rest of us what we can and can't do. Maybe these people need to take a look at their own lives and see what we can stop them from doing.And by the way what will be next?The next election i think that we to remove all the members of the county council and put people in office that care about Pickens County and not themselves.Wake up Pickens THIS IS SUPPOSE TO BE THE LAND OF THE FREE.
rocketgirl
|
February 06, 2009
Well said Snowbird. However, it would be an investment for business owners but one that should be long past due-you know back when smoking sections existing. The question that keeps nagging me is this - with state government considering increasing another dollar sales tax to cigs, and then the time spent on city and council meetings to prohibit smoking in public-where's the logic? Is anyone else considering the math?
snowbird
|
February 04, 2009
A smokeless environment

It is clear that separation of smokers from non-smokers combined

with air exchange technology is a complete solution to this largely

artificial problem. All it takes is regulating authorities setting the

standards for indoor air quality on passive smoke, and the technology

does the rest. Such air quality standards are common in industrial

and environmental contexts. But, to date, no country in the world has

set them for smoking areas. It seems clear that the reasons are not

scientific, nor are they economic or technical: they are political.

As to the annoyance of smoking, a compromise between smokers and non-smokers

can be reached, through setting a quality standard and the use of modern

ventilation technology.

Air ventilation can easily create a comfortable environment that removes not

just passive smoke, but also and especially the potentially serious

contaminants that are independent from smoking.

Thomas Laprade



Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: