Click here to purchase photos
Right and wrong rulings
2 years ago | 971 views | 1 1 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Recent decisions in the ongoing investigation of Gov. Mark Sanford have both encouraged and disappointed us.

On Nov. 5, the state Supreme Court denied a request from Sanford to keep the results of the State Ethics Commission investigation of the governor’s travel records private.

The request itself dismayed us, as Sanford has long been an advocate of open, transparent government, and had earlier pledged that he had nothing to hide, and that he would allow any investigation to be open to the public.

Then, reversing his position, the governor claimed that results of the probe could be used against him politically.

This claim struck us as odd, as Sanford has repeatedly said that he will not seek higher office once his second term is up in 2010.

As to the potential that the Ethics Commission’s findings could be used against him in possible impeachment proceedings, surely the governor realized that when he stated that he would cooperate with the Commission during their investigation.

We’re glad that the Supreme Court decided to uphold the right of the people to know what their elected leaders are doing while in office.

Allowing the results of the investigation to be kept between Ethics Commissioners and the governor would be doing a disservice to the people of this state.

After all, Sanford did enough hiding in June, when he disappeared for 5 days — secretly traveling to Argentina to break things off with his mistress.

That’s enough sneaking around for one administration.

While we’re heartened by the state Supreme Court ruling, we’re dismayed at a recent decision that Sanford can use the $1.7 million remaining in his campaign finance account to pay for his legal fees regarding the commission investigation.

When Sanford’s supporters donated to his campaign fund, they did so because they supported the governor, supported what he said he stood for, and what he’d already accomplished while in office, and they want to ensure his continued success as head of the ship of state.

They didn’t pledge funds to the governor to dig him out of a mess that’s largely of his own making — when he and the legislature should both be focusing on job creation and digging the state out of its financial hole.

After all, Sanford’s legal fees wouldn’t be so high if he hadn’t reneged on the earlier promise to keep the investigation’s results open.

But now that the campaign fund issue has been resolved, we hope that the governor will stop throwing roadblocks into the investigation, so that he, the General Assembly, and the rest of us can finally move on.

Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
mwp62
|
November 17, 2009
Mr. Sanford is independently wealthy, yet will be using the money of his campaign contributers for his legal defense. This is no surprise because he did not hesitate to use taxpayer money for personal flights, upgrades in commercial flights and private hotel rooms, etc.
report abuse...

Express yourself:
We're glad to give you a forum to air your point of view on issues important to this community. We just ask that you keep things civil. Leave out the personal attacks. Do not use offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or assail anyone's personal or religious beliefs. For anyone who can't be civil, we reserve the right to remove your material. We also reserve the right to ban users who violate our visitor's agreement.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gasoline Prices
Sponsored By:

featured businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: