Click here to purchase photos
Pickens to consider lowering rates for some business licenses
by Sandy Foster
8 months ago | 340 views | 0 0 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
PICKENS — Pickens officials restructured their method for determining business license fees this year, but one councilman said Monday night that some of those fees may have been increased too much.

Councilman Fletcher Perry said that in some categories, the cost of a business license increased by 300 percent.

“In these economic times, that is way too much,” he said.

Plus, Perry said that in the city’s efforts to attract new businesses, council did not want to discourage anyone with license fees that are too high.

He said he hopes the finance committee can come up with a recommendation on how to possibly reduce some of the rates in time for city council’s December meeting.

Perry also made a recommendation on behalf of the city’s finance committee to approve a $20,000 fee for Summit Engineering to resubmit the city’s revised plans for the water plant rehabilitation to S.C. Rural Development.

Perry said council now plans to fix the water plant in phases and estimated the cost of the first stage will be around $4 million. This is in contrast to the $16 million city officials originally planned to spend on the plant at one time.

City Council also voted unanimously to start requiring city employees to help cover the cost of their health insurance.

“In these tough economic times, we’re going to have to have our employees pay a portion of their healthcare costs,” Perry said.

Council agreed to have employees pay 10 percent of their premiums and the city pick up the remaining 90 percent, effective Jan. 1.

That would cost each employee $44 per month, according to city administrator Katherine Brackett.

Mayor David Owens said they will look into finding cheaper insurance rates, and that if they did, it may allow council to vote to reverse the decision to have employees pay a portion of the premiums.

Brackett said that by having employees help out with the cost, the city will save about $20,000 per year.

“We don’t want to do it, but it’s fair and a responsible move for the city at this time,” she said.

comments (0)
no comments yet
report abuse...

Express yourself:
We're glad to give you a forum to air your point of view on issues important to this community. We just ask that you keep things civil. Leave out the personal attacks. Do not use offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or assail anyone's personal or religious beliefs. For anyone who can't be civil, we reserve the right to remove your material. We also reserve the right to ban users who violate our visitor's agreement.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gasoline Prices
Sponsored By:

featured businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: